Why Be Moral? Social Contract Theory Versus Kantian-Christian Morality

Journal of Markets & Morality, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 2003

Posted: 15 Jul 2006

Abstract

According to social contract theories of morality, right and wrong are nothing more than the agreement among rationally self-interested individuals to give up the unhindered pursuit of their own desires for the security of living in peace. I argue that theism provides a better motivation for rationally self-interested persons to be moral. In the context of our moral development, we are involved in the project of becoming certain kinds of persons, and this project must extend into the next life within a community similar to Kant's kingdom of ends. The temporary squelching of desire necessary for the common good is rewarded in the long run with long-term desire-satisfaction (including both self-interested and altruistic desires), but the squelching of desire makes sense only, I argue, if the moral project continues into the next life.

Keywords: Immanuel Kant, social contract theory, morality

JEL Classification: B31, D86

Suggested Citation

Clark, Kelly James, Why Be Moral? Social Contract Theory Versus Kantian-Christian Morality. Journal of Markets & Morality, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 2003, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=914561

Kelly James Clark (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,240
PlumX Metrics