The Injustice in White-Collar Cases from Selectively Waiving Attorney-Client Privilege, as Shown by Mckesson

10 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2006

Date Written: January 29, 2006

Abstract

The attorney-client privilege protects communications between a client and his attorney, so that other litigants cannot demand these e-mails, letters, and so on through the pre-trial process of discovery. This privilege is ordinarily waived, however, if the client leaks such a document to a third party. Anybody else in litigation against the client can then demand a copy of the document for himself. There is, however, a little-known exception called the selective waiver doctrine, where privileged documents can be turned over to the government without making them available to other litigants. In theory it encourages companies under investigation by the federal government to cooperate by turning over confidential documents without fear of being sued by private civil plaintiffs on those same smoking gun documents.

But more realistically the selective waiver keeps defense materials away from white-collar defendants, such as mid-level and senior executives, who need those documents to prove their innocence. Private civil plaintiffs can choose their jurisdiction to avoid the selective waiver doctrine, as only a minority of state and federal jurisdictions has adopted it. Criminal defendants on the other hand do not have that luxury because it is not they but prosecutors who choose where to bring charges.

The problem of forum shopping was dramatically proven in 2005 in the multi-forum civil and criminal litigation on the McKesson HBOC securities fraud. Regardless of the merits of the selective waiver doctrine - and the emerging consensus is negative - the intractable forum-shopping problem means the selective waiver doctrine is useless if not unjust. It should be repealed in the jurisdictions where it remains good law.

Keywords: attorney-client, work product, selective waiver, limited waiver, mckesson, white collar, sec, cooperation

JEL Classification: K14, K41, K22

Suggested Citation

Lindholm, Stephen Bruce, The Injustice in White-Collar Cases from Selectively Waiving Attorney-Client Privilege, as Shown by Mckesson (January 29, 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=879508 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.879508

Stephen Bruce Lindholm (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
105
Abstract Views
920
rank
305,339
PlumX Metrics