The Elastics of Snap Removal: An Empirical Case Study of Textualism

51 Pages Posted: 17 Aug 2020 Last revised: 23 Jan 2021

See all articles by Thomas O. Main

Thomas O. Main

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

Jeffrey W. Stempel

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

David McClure

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

Date Written: 2020

Abstract

This article reports the findings of an empirical study of textualism as applied by federal judges interpreting the statute that permits removal of diversity cases from state to federal court. The “snap removal” provision in the statute is particularly interesting because its application forces judges into one of two interpretive camps—which are fairly extreme versions of textualism and purposivism, respectively. We studied characteristics of cases and judges to find predictors of textualist outcomes. In this article we offer a narrative discussion of key variables and we detail the results of our logistic regression analysis. The most salient predictive variable was the party of the president who appointed the judge. Female judges and young judges were also more likely to reach textualist outcomes. Cases involving torts were substantially more likely to be removed even though the statute raises a pure legal question upon which the subject matter of the case should have no bearing. Our most surprising finding was the impact of a judges’ undergraduate and legal education: the eliteness of the educational institution was positively correlated with removal for judges appointed by Republicans, but negatively correlated for judges appointed by Democrats. This disordinal interaction was especially striking since there was no party effect among judges who attended non-elite institutions. In addition to the aforementioned variables which were significant, several variables that were not predictive are also discussed; these include race, seniority, state court experience, and the prospect of multi-district case consolidations.

Keywords: snap removal, pre-service removal, removal, forum defendant rule, diversity jurisdiction, textualism, purposivism, statutory interpretation, judges, judicial experience, judicial backgrounds

Suggested Citation

Main, Thomas O. and Stempel, Jeffrey W. and McClure, David, The Elastics of Snap Removal: An Empirical Case Study of Textualism (2020). UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3674042 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674042

Thomas O. Main (Contact Author)

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
702-895-2927 (Phone)
702-895-2482 (Fax)

Jeffrey W. Stempel

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
702-895-2361 (Phone)
702-8952482 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://law.unlv.edu

David McClure

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
Abstract Views
456
rank
437,066
PlumX Metrics