Maitland's Challenge for Administrative Legal Theory

Modern Law Review, Forthcoming, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-2230.12573

24 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2020

Date Written: July 24, 2020

Abstract

This paper challenges the familiar strategy for theorizing administrative law. Theories of administrative law typically take the existence of administrative bodies for granted, and then ask, all things considered, what moral aim they should serve. The resulting approaches are committed to varying moral aims ranging from the rule of law to efficiency, but converge on the shared idea that the purpose of administrative law is to promote aims that could, in principle, be realized apart from it. As a critical matter, this paper argues that the familiar strategy opens the door to a devastating skeptical challenge. Because the benefits that administrative law brings can, in principle, be realized without it, administrative law may be rightly abandoned. As a constructive matter, this paper defends the idea that administrative law has a moral purpose that is inseparable from it: administrative law constitutes the exclusive means of realizing what positive rights demand.

Suggested Citation

Weinrib, Jacob, Maitland's Challenge for Administrative Legal Theory (July 24, 2020). Modern Law Review, Forthcoming, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-2230.12573, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3660051 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3660051

Jacob Weinrib (Contact Author)

Queen's University ( email )

Sutherland Hall
Room 544
Kingston, Ontario K7L3N6
Canada
416 452 9268 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://queensu.academia.edu/JacobWeinrib

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Abstract Views
268
rank
374,175
PlumX Metrics