Functions of Geoengineering Research Governance

9 Pages Posted: 29 Oct 2019 Last revised: 2 Nov 2019

See all articles by Jane Long

Jane Long

Independent

Edward (Ted) A. Parson

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: October 27, 2019

Abstract

Proposed geoengineering interventions, like other high-stakes and potentially disruptive technologies, present both a compelling case for expanded research to inform future decisions, and significant concerns about societal harms that may follow from this research, directly or indirectly. In response, there have been widespread calls to both expand research and govern this research with greater care and scrutiny than typical of the normal processes that govern all research areas. We propose that for geoengineering and similarly controversial issues, governance of research must fulfill three broad functions. First, processes are needed that enable reliable research, by providing the authorization, resources, and management necessary for research to proceed, together with the strategic planning and quality controls to ensure that research results are useful and relevant to inform societal choices. Second, processes are needed to assess potential harms or risks from research activities and ensure that these are appropriately managed. These potential harms may include both direct physical risks, and indirect risks mediated by social, economic, or political processes. Finally, processes are needed to support the legitimacy of the research program, by ensuring that the topics, methods, and conduct are compatible with relevant legal, political, and moral principles and are broadly acceptable to affected citizens. These requirements may interact closely with the processes that serve the first two functions, by requiring that research priorities, aims, conduct, participants, and results are transparently and promptly disclosed, that relevant citizen and stakeholder groups are consulted, and that broader implications of proposed research are acknowledged and addressed. Drawing on the concerns expressed in the current geoengineering debate, and on experience conducting and governing research in other areas, we discuss alternative concrete ways to provide these functions for geoengineering research. This paper was prepared as input to a workshop of senior state officials considering the implications of potential geoengineering research for California.

Keywords: geoengineering, research, governance, climate change, risk assessment, California

Suggested Citation

Long, Jane and Parson, Edward (Ted) A., Functions of Geoengineering Research Governance (October 27, 2019). UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 19-42, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3476376 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3476376

Jane Long

Independent ( email )

Edward (Ted) A. Parson (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
414
PlumX Metrics