The Role of FinTech in Mitigating Information Friction in Supply Chain Finance

30 Pages Posted: 16 Oct 2019

See all articles by Hsiao-Hui Lee

Hsiao-Hui Lee

National Chengchi University (NCCU) - Department of Management Information Systems

S. Alex Yang

London Business School

Kijin Kim

Asian Development Bank - Economic Research and Regional Cooperation Department (ERCD)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 6, 2019

Abstract

Micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in developing countries face severe financing difficulties, especially when trying to grow their businesses internationally. One significant cause of this financing gap is informational friction. Various supply chain finance products and solutions are introduced to mitigate such frictions by leveraging on information from the extended supply chain of the borrower. The recent development in FinTech, which is closely related to information technologies, has offered new opportunities to further improve the efficiency of supply chain finance. In this paper, we propose a conceptual and analytical framework to study how FinTech can close the financing gap by reducing information friction. Under this framework, we classify various types of FinTech into two categories: information processing technology and information collecting technology. The former one (denoted as Type-A), including analytics and artificial intelligence, allows financial institutions to efficiently process and transform raw data into useful information (signals) that can directly guide the decision-making process. The latter one (denoted as Type-B), including blockchain, biometrics and identity management, and digitalization, allows financial institutions to collect additional and accurate data/information to be processed in the decision-making process. Using this framework, we find that both types of FinTech help closing the financing gap by lowering the probability that a good firm is mis-classified as a bad one. The two types of FinTech can be complements or substitutes. Banks' optimal Type-A investment increases in the bank's size, profit margin, and the fraction of good firms in the market. They invest in Type-B if and only if the investment is sufficiently small. Due to double marginalization, the bank's optimal FinTech investment level is lower than the socially optimal level. This calls for additional mechanisms that simulate or complement banks' investment in FinTech.

Keywords: FinTech, Supply Chain Finance, Trade Finance, Information, Analytics, AI, Blockchain, Digitalization

JEL Classification: O14, O24, O31

Suggested Citation

Lee, Hsiao-Hui and Yang, S. Alex and Kim, Kijin, The Role of FinTech in Mitigating Information Friction in Supply Chain Finance (June 6, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3465308 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3465308

Hsiao-Hui Lee

National Chengchi University (NCCU) - Department of Management Information Systems ( email )

No. 64, Section 2, Zhǐnán Rd
Wenshan District
Taipei City
Taiwan

S. Alex Yang (Contact Author)

London Business School ( email )

Sussex Place
Regent's Park
London, London NW1 4SA
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://faculty.london.edu/sayang/

Kijin Kim

Asian Development Bank - Economic Research and Regional Cooperation Department (ERCD) ( email )

Philippines

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
685
rank
166,530
PlumX Metrics