Retirement Security: Income and Wealth Disparities Continue through Old Age

GAO-19-587, August 2019

131 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2019

See all articles by Charles A. Jeszeck

Charles A. Jeszeck

Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Michael J. Collins

Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Jennifer Gregory

Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Garrick Donnelly

Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Kathleen McQueeney

Brandeis University

Chris Wickham

Independent

Christopher Zbrozek

Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Date Written: September 16, 2019

Abstract

Income and wealth inequality in the United States have increased over the last several decades. At the same time, life expectancy has been rising, although not uniformly across the U.S. population. Taken together, these trends may have significant effects on Americans' financial security in retirement.

GAO was asked to examine the distribution of income and wealth among older Americans, as well as its association with longevity, and identify the implication that these trends may have on retirement security. This report examines (1) the distributions of income and wealth among all older Americans over time; (2) the association between income, wealth, and longevity among older Americans; and (3) how the distributions of income and wealth changed over time for a cohort of individuals as they aged. To conduct this work, GAO analyzed data from two nationally representative surveys: the SCF, using data from 1989 through 2016, and the HRS. GAO used 1992 through 2014 HRS data linked to earnings records from the Social Security Administration. While preliminary 2016 HRS data are available, GAO used 2014 data, which contain more complete information for GAO's analysis. GAO also reviewed studies and interviewed researchers to further analyze the relationships between income, wealth, longevity, and retirement security.

Disparities in income and wealth among older households have become greater over the past 3 decades, according to GAO's analysis of Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) data. GAO divided older households into five groups (quintiles) based on their income and wealth. Each year of data in the analysis, and, thus, each quintile, included different sets of households over time. Average income and wealth was generally higher over time (see fig. 1 for average income), disproportionately so for the top quintile (top 20 percent). For example, in 2016, households in the top quintile had estimated average income of $398,000, compared to about $53,000 for the middle quintile and about $14,000 for the bottom quintile. GAO also found that for quintiles with lower wealth, future income from Social Security and defined benefit pensions provide a relatively significant portion of resources in retirement for those who expect such income.

A substantial number of older Americans born from 1931 through 1941 lived at least into their 70s or early 80s, according to GAO's analysis of data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative survey which follows the same individuals over time. GAO divided individuals born from 1931 through 1941 into quintiles based on their mid-career household earnings using records from the Social Security Administration. GAO's analysis, as well as that of other researchers, shows that differences in income, wealth, and demographic characteristics were associated with disparities in longevity. However, even with these disparities, we found a substantial number of people in the sample were alive in 2014, including those with characteristics associated with reduced average longevity, such as low earnings (see fig. 2) and low educational attainment. Taken all together, individuals may live a long time, even individuals with factors associated with lower longevity, such as low income or education. Those with fewer resources in retirement who live a long time may have to rely primarily on Social Security or safety net programs.

GAO's analysis of HRS data also found that disparities in household income decreased while disparities in wealth persisted as a cohort of older Americans aged from approximately their 50s into their 70s or early 80s. Income disparities decreased between higher- and lower-earning households because higher-earning households saw larger drops in income over time, indicating the possible transition from working to retirement. For example, we estimated median income for the top mid-career earnings group decreased by 53 percent while estimated median income for the bottom earnings group decreased by 36 percent over the same period. Wealth remained relatively steady for households in the bottom three earnings groups over the time period GAO examined, while households in the top two earnings groups experienced larger fluctuations in wealth. GAO estimated that median retirement account balances and median home equity increased across earnings groups for households that had these assets. However, the continued wealth disparities may be due to significant differences in the median value of retirement accounts and home equity between higher- and lower-earning households. GAO also found that white households in the bottom two earnings groups had higher estimated median incomes, and white households in all earnings groups generally had greater estimated median wealth, than racial minority households in those earnings groups. In addition, within each earnings group, households headed by someone with at least some college education generally had higher median incomes and wealth than households headed by someone who did not attend college.

Suggested Citation

Jeszeck, Charles A. and Collins, Michael Joseph and Gregory, Jennifer and Donnelly, Garrick and McQueeney, Kathleen and Wickham, Chris and Zbrozek, Christopher, Retirement Security: Income and Wealth Disparities Continue through Old Age (September 16, 2019). GAO-19-587, August 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3454773

Charles A. Jeszeck (Contact Author)

Government Accountability Office (GAO) ( email )

441 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20548
United States

Michael Joseph Collins

Government Accountability Office (GAO) ( email )

441 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20548
United States

Jennifer Gregory

Government Accountability Office (GAO) ( email )

441 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20548
United States

Garrick Donnelly

Government Accountability Office (GAO) ( email )

441 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20548
United States

Kathleen McQueeney

Brandeis University

Waltham, MA 02454
United States

Chris Wickham

Independent ( email )

Christopher Zbrozek

Government Accountability Office (GAO) ( email )

441 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20548
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
258
PlumX Metrics