Societal Complexity versus Learn to Live Together: Contemporaneous ‘Science/Culture/Religion Dialogue.’ Compram Methodology and ‘Decisional Nomology’ Contributions (Presentation Slides)
98 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2018
Date Written: July 6, 2018
There is the OR community’s related heritage, challenge, tensions/perspectives within the possible ‘Science/Culture/Religion Dialogue.’ In order to acknowledge the tragedy of war (mostly within the actual 100 years from the end of the WW1) at least the scientific community would advance any alternative solution comparing to the war oriented track of the 20 century – and no significant ideas/acts within the started 21 century. There is the projects oriented (re)search from the still open International Consortium Generosity/Creativity/Solidarity: LEARN TO LIVE TOGETHER (hypothetical) reality, modeling/simulation/emulation and ideals generations – as a subtle turning point into the possible Network of Networks on. The co-organizers of the current OR and Ethics stream into Euro Conference 2018 Valencia have synergic and original contributions within – i.e. Prof. dr. Dorien DeTombe’s COMPRAM Methodology, and Prof. dr. Cathal Brugha’s Decisional Nomology. So, the study proceeds on the open Ethics and OR new realm onto the contemporary global (post-)crisis reverse as Inter/Trans/Co-disciplinary, Intercultural and Ecumenical approaches oriented within the thesis: Knowledge Society toward Consciousness Society. A related (f)act to tacit and explicit knowledge/innovation, and follow up consequences would draw up and extend an implementation of a ‘Local’ Nucleus of an IN OVO inquiring “Science-NATURE-Culture-SPIRITUALITY-Religion Meta-Dialogue”.
Keywords: Complex Societal Problems, Behavioral OR, Social Networks
JEL Classification: C89, D57, D59, D79, D81, D83, D99, I19, I29, J2, L39, O39, Z10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation