Are Payoff Maximisers More Pro-social? Evidence from a Prisoner's Dilemma Experiment

10 Pages Posted: 31 Mar 2016 Last revised: 22 Feb 2021

Date Written: October 24, 2017

Abstract

Are high earners more likely to sacrifice their own payoff to help others? Our paper provides a formal answer by experimentally studying cooperative behaviour in a finitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma. The subjects play the game in two phases against different types of opponents: other human players (capturing pro-social behaviour) and a known computer algorithm (capturing a player's ability and willingness to earn monetary rewards). Subjects who played a payoff-maximising strategy against a computer algorithm are more cooperative when paired with human subjects, compared to those who did not play a payoff-maximising strategy. The difference in cooperation rates increases as the subjects gain experience with the game.

Keywords: Prisoner's Dilemma, Repeated Games, Payoff Maximisation, Pro-social Behaviour

JEL Classification: C72, C73, C91, H49

Suggested Citation

Kozlovskaya, Maria, Are Payoff Maximisers More Pro-social? Evidence from a Prisoner's Dilemma Experiment (October 24, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2755062 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2755062

Maria Kozlovskaya (Contact Author)

Aston University ( email )

Aston Triangle
Birmingham, B4 7ET
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.mariakozlovskaya.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
68
Abstract Views
608
rank
404,804
PlumX Metrics