Locational Justice: Race, Class, and the Grassroots Protest of Property Takings

30 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2016

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

Defining “locational justice” as the “where” of justice, this article takes the grassroots opposition to Kelo as its point of ignition. To consider how a populist movement may sustain hope for locational justice, the article is framed around a case study of a grassroots challenge to a city’s plans to “redevelop,” (i.e., eliminate) its historic African American community. Proposing that lessons from that struggle may be instructive to the post-Kelo protest movement, the article argues that locational justice may be advanced through racial and socioeconomic coalitions that seek political and economic participation in democratic processes, not simply through judicial or legislative protections of property rights.

Keywords: Supreme Court, Kelo v. City of New London, poor, people of color, African American, populist, grassroots, eminent domain, Fifth Amendment, , racial, socioeconomic, political, coalitions, governmental violation, residential property rights, locational justice, gentrification

Suggested Citation

Koons, Judith E., Locational Justice: Race, Class, and the Grassroots Protest of Property Takings (2006). Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2743802

Judith E. Koons (Contact Author)

Barry University School of Law ( email )

6441 E. Colonial Dr.
Orlando, FL 32807
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
22
Abstract Views
224
PlumX Metrics