Resisting Revenge Pornography: When Victims Strike Back

(2016) 25 Canadian Cases on the Law of Torts (4th) 45

22 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2016 Last revised: 15 Jul 2016

See all articles by Amar Khoday

Amar Khoday

University of Manitoba - Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2016

Abstract

This article is a case commentary which examines a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice - Jane Doe 464533 v ND, 2016 ONSC 541. The case represents an important precedent which applies particular common law torts for the first time in Canada to an instance of revenge pornography and where the court awarded damages. Drawing from similar decisions from Australia and the United States, the article examines the Doe court's use of these common law torts as well as the damages awarded. Furthermore, the article argues that the case represents an avenue through which victims of revenge pornography may use civil litigation as a form of resistance to the oppression that this phenomenon represents.

Keywords: revenge porn, revenge pornography, Ontario, Canada, Australia, United States, Tort law, breach of confidence, public disclosure of private facts, intentional infliction of mental distress, general damages, aggravated damages, punitive damages, resistance, victim, agency

JEL Classification: K13, K41, K42

Suggested Citation

Khoday, Amar, Resisting Revenge Pornography: When Victims Strike Back (March 1, 2016). (2016) 25 Canadian Cases on the Law of Torts (4th) 45, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741978

Amar Khoday (Contact Author)

University of Manitoba - Faculty of Law ( email )

224 Dysart Rd.
University of Manitoba Faculty of Law
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
269
Abstract Views
1,494
rank
140,200
PlumX Metrics