Corporate Governance, Pay Equity, and the Limitations of Agency Theory

40 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2015

See all articles by Marc T. Moore

Marc T. Moore

University College London, Faculty of Laws

Date Written: February 17, 2015


It is well known that recent decades have seen an explosion in levels of senior executive remuneration in public companies, both in absolute terms and in relative terms to ordinary worker pay. However, a conspicuous corresponding trend over recent years has been the development of a range of countervailing regulatory tools designed to mitigate this disparity within various national environments. These include regulatory pay ratio caps, bonus bans, and mandatory pay ratio disclosures. Notwithstanding these salient developments, prevailing legal and economic debates on senior executive and worker pay remain rooted in the dominant principal-agent paradigm of corporate governance, which consistently disputes the relevance of equitable or distributive fairness concerns to the essentially functional challenge of determining effective agent incentives. In this article, I take issue with the orthodox principal-agent perspective on pay equity, by demonstrating the centrality of equitable concerns to effective agent-incentive design, both at senior executive and ordinary worker levels.

Keywords: corporate governance, executive remuneration, inequality, law and economics, theory of the firm, regulation

JEL Classification: G34, G38, K22, N22

Suggested Citation

Moore, Marc T., Corporate Governance, Pay Equity, and the Limitations of Agency Theory (February 17, 2015). University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 8/2015, Available at SSRN: or

Marc T. Moore (Contact Author)

University College London, Faculty of Laws ( email )

Gower St
London WC1E OEG, WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics