Do Investors Misprice Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost?

Accounting & Finance, Forthcoming

42 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2014

See all articles by Yong-Chul Shin

Yong-Chul Shin

University of Massachusetts Boston

Kun Yu

University of Massachusetts Boston

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 30, 2014

Abstract

We examine whether and how investors misprice the components of net periodic pension cost under SFAS No. 87 and 158. We find that investors appear to have difficulty in understanding the transitory feature of other net periodic pension cost (PPOPCC) and thus overestimate its persistence, which in turn leads to the mispricing of PPOPCC in the pre-158 period. We also find that SFAS No. 158 appears to reduce the mispricing of PPOPCC, suggesting a positive effect of SFAS No. 158 on investors’ valuation of pension items in the income statement. Additional analysis suggests that investors also overestimate the persistence of, and thus misprice, pension-related cash flows and accruals in the pre-158 period and that SFAS No. 158 reduces the mispricing of pension-related cash flows and accruals.

Keywords: net periodic pension cost, SFAS No. 158, mispricing, persistence, pension accruals

JEL Classification: M41, G14

Suggested Citation

Shin, Yong-Chul and Yu, Kun, Do Investors Misprice Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost? (June 30, 2014). Accounting & Finance, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2461531

Yong-Chul Shin

University of Massachusetts Boston ( email )

Boston, MA 02125
United States

Kun Yu (Contact Author)

University of Massachusetts Boston ( email )

100 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, MA 02125
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
1,605
PlumX Metrics