Why is Cost-Benefit Analysis so Controversial?

Posted: 24 Jan 2001

See all articles by Robert H. Frank

Robert H. Frank

Cornell University - Department of Economics

Abstract

The cost-benefit principle says we should take those actions, and only those actions, whose benefits exceed their costs. For many, this principle's common-sensical ring makes it hard to imagine how anyone could disagree. Yet critics of cost-benefit analysis are both numerous and outspoken. Many of them argue that cost-benefit analysis is unacceptable as a matter of principle. I begin by noting why many find this argument largely unpersuasive. I then examine several conventions adopted by cost-benefit analysts that do appear to yield misleading prescriptions. Finally, I consider the possibility that the cost-benefit principle may itself suggest why we might not always want to employ cost-benefit analysis as the explicit rationale for our actions.

Suggested Citation

Frank, Robert, Why is Cost-Benefit Analysis so Controversial?. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=231110

Robert Frank (Contact Author)

Cornell University - Department of Economics ( email )

414 Uris Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853-7601
United States
607-255-8501 (Phone)
607-254-4590 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
2,348
PlumX Metrics