Indicators of Audit Fees and Fraud Classification: Impact of SOX

Posted: 13 Sep 2012

See all articles by Mary Jane Lenard

Mary Jane Lenard

Meredith College

Karin A. Petruska

Youngstown State University

Pervaiz Alam

Kent State University

Bing Yu

Meredith College

Date Written: May 28, 2012

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare the effect of corporate governance variables and fraud litigation on audit fees both before and after the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act in 2002.

Design/methodology/approach – The paper utilizes a sample of firms that had litigation proceedings filed against them for fraudulent financial reporting, and compare these firms to a sample of non-fraud firms in the pre-and post-SOX period. First, the authors examine indicators of audit fees using the Simunic model. Next, the authors develop a logistic regression model with corporate governance variables and other financial control variables in order to identify the characteristics of firms that are accused of fraud in the pre-and post-SOX period.

Findings – The paper identifies specific components of corporate governance that are positively related to audit fees and which subsequently aid in classifying companies subject to fraud litigation. The most successful logistic regression model for 2005 (post-SOX) is 64.4 per cent accurate in distinguishing firms litigated for fraud, while the most successful model for 2001 (pre-SOX) is 61.4 per cent accurate in distinguishing such firms.

Originality/value – The research design and findings assist in providing additional evidence about the association between the effectiveness of the corporate governance structure and the external auditor in assessing the risk of fraud.

Keywords: Audit fees, auditing, corporate governance, financial reporting, fraudulent financial reporting, litigation risk

JEL Classification: M42, G34

Suggested Citation

Lenard, Mary Jane and Petruska, Karin A. and Alam, Pervaiz and Yu, Bing, Indicators of Audit Fees and Fraud Classification: Impact of SOX (May 28, 2012). Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2143350

Mary Jane Lenard (Contact Author)

Meredith College ( email )

3800 Hillsborough St
Raleigh, NC 27607
United States

Karin A. Petruska

Youngstown State University ( email )

Lariccia School of Accounting & Finance
Williamson College of Business Administration
Youngstown, OH 44555
United States
330-941-1876 (Phone)
330-941-1459 (Fax)

Pervaiz Alam

Kent State University ( email )

P.O. Box 5190
Kent, OH 44242-0001
United States
330-672-1121 (Phone)
330-672-2548 (Fax)

Bing Yu

Meredith College ( email )

United States
919-760-8486 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
850
PlumX Metrics