In Defense of Public-Sector Unions

36 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2012 Last revised: 27 Aug 2014

See all articles by Anne Marie Lofaso

Anne Marie Lofaso

West Virginia University - College of Law

Date Written: 2011


The United States is currently in a heated debate over the extent to which public-sector workers should be permitted to band together for mutual aid or protection, to form, join or assist unions, and to bargain collectively. This debate was sparked when, shortly after the 2010 midterm elections, politicians in states with large public deficits blamed public-sector unions for budget shortfalls. Public unions are not, however, the cause of the states’ ills. After all, public unions are not the source of wages and benefits — governments are. Furthermore, the evidence shows that, in general, public-sector-union pay is lower than the pay of their private sector counterparts even when benefits are taken into account; tenure is typically not collectively negotiated but grounded in civil-servant statutes; and arbitration is not a union benefit but the cost that unions pay for a no-strike promise. Given the evidence, it is instructive to ask the following two questions. First, why are public workers, especially public-union employees, the subject of such vitriolic attack? Second, are public-sector unions worth defending?

Suggested Citation

Lofaso, Anne Marie, In Defense of Public-Sector Unions (2011). Hofstra Labor and Emploment Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 301, 2011, WVU Law Research Paper No. 2012-02, Available at SSRN:

Anne Marie Lofaso (Contact Author)

West Virginia University - College of Law ( email )

PO Box 6130
101 Law Center Drive
Morgantown, WV 26506-6130
United States
304-293-7356 (Phone)
304-293-6891 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics