The Evolution of Normative Legal Scholarship: The Case of Copyright Discourse

5 European Journal of Legal Studies 23 2013

16 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2012 Last revised: 27 Mar 2013

See all articles by Patrick Russell Goold

Patrick Russell Goold

City University London, The City Law School

Date Written: June 5, 2012

Abstract

Legal scholarship’s central function is to provide normative advice about the law. However, some academics have challenged the importance of such scholarship. Pierre Schlag argues that this function of legal scholarship is “unravelling” because judges and legislators do not listen to academic opinions. This unravelling would seem to be present in the field of copyright law where numerous instances suggest that normative legal scholarship is ignored. However, copyright scholarship has evolved to overcome this problem. Today the most influential copyright scholarship comes not in law reviews or similar traditional academic outlets, but through publicly oriented books and social media. Rather than aim normative advice to lawmakers, scholars give their advice to the public generally. The public then hold the lawmakers accountable for enacting bad laws. In this way, academics can retain their position as normative advice givers.

Keywords: Normative, Legal, Scholarship, Copyright, Public

Suggested Citation

Goold, Patrick Russell, The Evolution of Normative Legal Scholarship: The Case of Copyright Discourse (June 5, 2012). 5 European Journal of Legal Studies 23 2013 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2077417 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2077417

Patrick Russell Goold (Contact Author)

City University London, The City Law School ( email )

London, EC1V OHB
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
103
Abstract Views
901
rank
313,089
PlumX Metrics