The Law of Medical Misadventure in Japan

34 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2011 Last revised: 10 Jun 2013

See all articles by Robert B Leflar

Robert B Leflar

National Taiwan University; University of Arkansas School of Law

Date Written: November 12, 2011

Abstract

This paper offers a comprehensive overview of Japanese law and practice relating to iatrogenic (medically-caused) injury, with comparisons to other nations’ medical law systems. The paper addresses criminal sanctions for Japanese physicians’ negligent and illegal acts; civil law principles of substantive law and related issues of procedure, practice, and liability insurance; and administrative measures including health ministry programs aimed at expanding and improving the quality of peer review within Japanese medicine, and a recently implemented no-fault compensation system for birth-related injuries.

Among the paper’s findings are these. Criminal and civil actions increased rapidly after highly publicized medical error events at the turn of the 21st century, peaked from 2004 (civil cases filed) to 2006 (cases police sent to prosecutors), and have since declined. Civil Code provisions of substantive law governing medical injury compensation differ little from rules applied in North America and Western Europe, although the burden of proof of causation is relaxed in informed consent and loss-of-chance cases. Damage awards appear to be at least as high on average as in the U.S., and are applied on a more consistent basis. Procedural reforms, including the institution of health care divisions of district courts in some metropolitan areas, have speeded up the pace of court proceedings.

The new no-fault compensation system for birth-related injuries. offering substantial profit opportunities (as well as a theoretical risk of loss) to private insurers, has achieved virtually universal buy-in by childbirth facilities hoping for protection from future litigation. Evaluation of the system’s operation is still premature but worthy of scholarly attention. Should the obstetrical compensation system prove successful, it may serve as a springboard for the expansion of no-fault principles to cover a wider scope of medical injuries — a topic now under study.

Keywords: medical malpractice, Japan, comparative law, no-fault compensation, patient safety

JEL Classification: N45

Suggested Citation

Leflar, Robert B, The Law of Medical Misadventure in Japan (November 12, 2011). Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 79-110 (2012), University of Arkansas Research Paper No. 13-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1958679

Robert B Leflar (Contact Author)

National Taiwan University ( email )

No.1, Sec.4, Roosevelt Road
Taipei, 10617, 10617
Taiwan
14794667406 (Phone)

University of Arkansas School of Law ( email )

1495 S. Finger Road
1045 W. Maple St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States
14794667406 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
Abstract Views
1,058
rank
209,221
PlumX Metrics