Was Mechanization De-Skilling? The Origins of Task-Biased Technical Change

40 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2011 Last revised: 31 Jan 2012

See all articles by James E. Bessen

James E. Bessen

Technology & Policy Research Initiative, BU School of Law

Date Written: March 18, 2011

Abstract

Did nineteenth century technology reduce demand for skilled workers in contrast to modern technology? I obtain direct evidence on human capital investments and the returns to skill by using micro-data on individual weavers and an engineering production function. Weavers learned substantially on the job. While mechanization eliminated some tasks and the associated skills, it increased returns to skill on the remaining tasks. Technical change was task-biased, much as with computer technology. As more tasks were automated, weavers’ human capital increased substantially. Although technology increased the demand for skill like today, weavers’ wages eventually increased and inequality decreased, contrary to current trends.

Keywords: Skill-Biased Technical Change, Technology, Engineering Production Function, Mechanization, Human Capital, Wage Inequality, Learning-by-Doing

JEL Classification: J31, N31, O33

Suggested Citation

Bessen, James E., Was Mechanization De-Skilling? The Origins of Task-Biased Technical Change (March 18, 2011). Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 11-13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1789688 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1789688

James E. Bessen (Contact Author)

Technology & Policy Research Initiative, BU School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
301
Abstract Views
2,744
rank
120,267
PlumX Metrics