The Catastrophe of What Passes for Alcohol Analysis

Reason Foundation Policy Brief No. 78

6 Pages Posted: 18 Sep 2010 Last revised: 18 Feb 2021

See all articles by Edward Peter Stringham

Edward Peter Stringham

Trinity College; American Institute for Economic Research

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

Is alcohol a good like other economic goods, or is alcohol a “catastrophe” that should be heavily taxed? In two recently published studies - “The Cost of Alcohol in California,” published in Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, and “The Annual Catastrophe of Alcohol in California,” published by the Marin Institute - Simon Rosen, Ted Miller and Michelle Simon claim that moderate-to-high alcohol consumption costs the state of California $38.4 billion per year, or roughly $1,000 for each of the state’s residents. Despite the popularity of Rosen, Miller and Simon’s research among politicians, any amount of economic investigation into their research methods shows their conclusions are dubious at best. Although Rosen, Miller and Simon’s research appears scientific, careful analysis shows that it is little more than a poorly supported effort to promote a prohibitionist agenda.

Keywords: social costs, alcohol consumption, alcohol abuse, responsible drinkers

JEL Classification: I112, H76, J24

Suggested Citation

Stringham, Edward Peter, The Catastrophe of What Passes for Alcohol Analysis (2009). Reason Foundation Policy Brief No. 78, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1676263

Edward Peter Stringham (Contact Author)

Trinity College ( email )

Hartford, CT 06106
United States

American Institute for Economic Research ( email )

PO Box 1000
Great Barrington, MA 01230
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1
Abstract Views
39
PlumX Metrics