When Should Asset Appreciation Be Taxed?: The Case for a Disposition Standard of Realization

56 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2010 Last revised: 18 Mar 2010

See all articles by Jeffrey L. Kwall

Jeffrey L. Kwall

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

Date Written: February 24, 2010

Abstract

The realization requirement is one of the most basic elements of the United States income tax. Due to this requirement, any increase in the value of a person’s property is not taxed when it occurs. Rather, the tax on asset appreciation is deferred until the occurrence of a realization event; i.e., the property is transferred in exchange for money or other consideration. By contrast, all other forms of income (e.g., salary, rents) are taxed immediately.

The realization requirement is inequitable because it causes asset appreciation to be taxed more favorably than other forms of income, thereby violating the normative goal of taxing all forms of income alike. The realization requirement is also inefficient because it favors investments generating economic returns in the form of asset appreciation (as opposed to periodic returns), thereby violating the normative goal of imposing taxes that do not distort investment decisions. In addition, the realization requirement adds complexity to the tax system and sacrifices potential tax revenue due to the deferral it confers.

In light of the inequity, inefficiency and complexity of the realization requirement, the requirement should be modified. Reformers have long argued that asset appreciation should be taxed as it occurs under a mark-to-market system. However, taxing asset appreciation as it occurs presents serious administrative problems because it requires an annual assessment of the value of every taxpayer’s assets. In addition, strong political resistance exists to taxing “paper gains.” For these reasons, it is unlikely that a comprehensive mark-to-market system will ever be adopted.

Due to the dim prospect of a mark-to-market system, this Article proposes the adoption of a “disposition” standard of realization. That standard would treat every transfer of property as a realization event regardless of whether the transferor receives consideration for the transferred property. Unlike current law, the disposition standard would tax lifetime gifts, as well as testamentary transfers, of appreciated property.

A disposition standard is a second-best alternative to a mark-to-market system. This new standard would curtail the inequity and inefficiency of the current realization requirement while posing less significant administrative and political problems than a mark-to-market system. In addition, the disposition standard would simplify existing law by substituting a clear and administrable set of rules for the current ambiguous and anachronistic system. Finally, a disposition standard should help to generate much needed tax revenue.

Suggested Citation

Kwall, Jeffrey L., When Should Asset Appreciation Be Taxed?: The Case for a Disposition Standard of Realization (February 24, 2010). Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 86, 2010, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2010-001, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1558610 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1558610

Jeffrey L. Kwall (Contact Author)

Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )

Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-915-7152 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
448
Abstract Views
2,079
rank
80,637
PlumX Metrics