Textiles Beyond the Mfa Phase-Out

The Center for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR), Working Paper No. 13/98

31 Pages Posted: 25 Feb 1999

See all articles by Dean Spinanger

Dean Spinanger

University of Kiel - Institute for World Economics (IfW)

Date Written: July 1998

Abstract

The Uruguay Round (UR) Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC), which was meant to undo the MFA, is to be effected by the year 2005 despite inherent tendencies in the past to continually protect textile and clothing (T&C) industries. How did we get into this protectionist quagmire? What lay behind being able to sell protection in importing countries to T&C exporting countries? What pattern of T&C trade has hence evolved and what are the implications thereof? Based on this background the paper analyzes what currently influences where we now are four years after the UR ratification. Aside from tariffs and non-tariff barriers, major influences include regional trade agreements, changing locational demands, normal development trends and shifting factor intensities of production. It is then cautiously concluded that, despite backloading liberalization and factors which increase the pressure from major T&C exporting countries, the wrapping up of the ATC by Jan. 1st., 2005, will be basically abided by, even if it is accompanied by some sidestepping and perhaps postponements.

JEL Classification: F13, L67

Suggested Citation

Spinanger, Dean, Textiles Beyond the Mfa Phase-Out (July 1998). The Center for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR), Working Paper No. 13/98, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=146963 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.146963

Dean Spinanger (Contact Author)

University of Kiel - Institute for World Economics (IfW) ( email )

Duesternbrooker Weg 120
D-24118 Kiel
Germany
+49 431 8814 x207 (Phone)
+49 431 8814 x500 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
300
Abstract Views
1,967
rank
120,886
PlumX Metrics