Pareto, Consent, and Respect for Dignity: A Kantian Perspective

Review of Social Economy, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2009

30 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2008

See all articles by Mark D. White

Mark D. White

CUNY College of Staten Island

Date Written: September 4, 2008

Abstract

This paper argues that the Pareto standard, by which policy changes are approved if they benefit at least one person and harms no one, is ethically questionable despite its nearly universal acceptance among economists and philosophers alike. As usually implemented, the Pareto standard bypasses actual consent, relying instead on hypothetical consent based on imputed measures of preferences or well-being. By so circumventing actual choice, the Pareto standard violates the respect for the dignity of autonomous agents, as emphasized by Immanuel Kant. If actual consent is obtained, however, the independent relevance of the Pareto standard is endangered.

Keywords: Pareto improvement, preferences, consent, dignity, Immanuel Kant

Suggested Citation

White, Mark D., Pareto, Consent, and Respect for Dignity: A Kantian Perspective (September 4, 2008). Review of Social Economy, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1274308

Mark D. White (Contact Author)

CUNY College of Staten Island ( email )

Staten Island, NY
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
136
Abstract Views
889
rank
262,047
PlumX Metrics