The IDEA Eligibility Mess

78 Pages Posted: 6 Aug 2008 Last revised: 24 May 2012

See all articles by Mark C. Weber

Mark C. Weber

DePaul University College of Law

Date Written: August 5, 2008


The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees students with disabilities a free public education appropriate to their needs. To be eligible for that entitlement, a student must meet the definition of "child with a disability." The law governing special education eligibility, however, is charitably characterized as a mess.

There are several sources of the current eligibility confusion. First, recent court cases have reached conflicting conclusions about how much adverse educational impact the child's disabling condition must have, what constitutes a sufficient need for special education, and when children with emotional disabilities are eligible. Second, long-established methods for assessing learning disabilities have withered under criticism from educational experts, and a new method of approaching learning disabilities, response-to-intervention, is being touted by the United States Department of Education. Nevertheless, that innovation remains largely unproven and may be impossible to implement at scale. Third, Congress and others have focused long-overdue attention on the disproportionate percentage of African-Americans who are found eligible for special education under the disability categories of mental retardation and emotional disturbance, but neither Congress nor anyone else appears to have a promising idea about how to address the situation.

This Article analyzes and critiques the recent cases, describes and comments on the new learning disability assessment methodology, and evaluates competing ideas about how to respond to ethnic disproportion. It concludes that the solution to the entire set of problems is not a redefinition of special education eligibility under IDEA, but rather a renewed attention to the actual terms of the statute and the goal of full educational opportunity. This step will promote what might be called "not-quite-so-special education," that is, an entitlement for a broad class of children to high quality special education supports provided in the regular educational environment.

Keywords: special education, education, disability, civil rights

JEL Classification: I20, I28, J71

Suggested Citation

Weber, Mark C., The IDEA Eligibility Mess (August 5, 2008). Buffalo Law Review, Vol. 57, p. 83, 2009, Available at SSRN:

Mark C. Weber (Contact Author)

DePaul University College of Law ( email )

25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL Cook County 60604-2287
United States
312-362-8808 (Phone)
312-362-5448 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics