Mandatory IPO Grading: Reflections from the Indian Capital Markets

Icfai Journal of Corporate and Securities Law, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 8-22, November 2008

20 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2008 Last revised: 23 Mar 2009

See all articles by Tarun Jain

Tarun Jain

Supreme Court of India

Raghav Sharma

National Law University Jodhpur (NLUJ)

Date Written: February 26, 2008

Abstract

Capital market regulators have hitherto insisted on a disclosure based regime, with respect to Initial Public Offerings (IPO), to provide investors with more and more information so that they can evaluate their investment options in a better way. However, more disclosure creates information overload for unsophisticated investors and this coupled with limited decision making capacity of such investors results in bad investment decisions. This calls for innovative regulation which would increase the probability of effective utilization of the disclosed information by such investors.

Taking cognizance of this problem, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has introduced a novel concept of mandatory IPO grading for assessment of 'fundamentals' of issuer companies by Credit Rating Agencies. The assigned grades will act as an additional investment guidance tool for the unsophisticated investors who are wary of prolix disclosure documentation. The issue has immense international significance in view of the fact that it is a unique regulatory stance without precedent in any jurisdiction across the globe.

In this paper, we make an attempt to explore and explain the concept and its underlying rationale and to provide an objective evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with it.

(I) WHAT IS IPO Grading? (II) Legal Framework for IPO Grading (III) The Raison d'etre for IPO Grading A) Counteracting Information Overload B) Tackling Information Asymmetry (IV) Arguments against IPO Grading A) Can an IPO be graded? B) Spelling Doom for Small & Medium Enterprises? C) Dubious Credibility of Credit Rating Agencies (V) Another Instance of 'Tunnel Vision' Regulation? (VI) Conclusion

Keywords: Initial Public Offering, IPO Grading, Credit Rating Agencies, Small and Medium Enterprises, grading, Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI, SME, India, capital market, regulator, disclosure, information asymmetry, market for lemons, information overload, investor protection, SEC

JEL Classification: K20, K22, K23, K29

Suggested Citation

Jain, Tarun and Sharma, Raghav, Mandatory IPO Grading: Reflections from the Indian Capital Markets (February 26, 2008). Icfai Journal of Corporate and Securities Law, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 8-22, November 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1113225

Tarun Jain (Contact Author)

Supreme Court of India ( email )

New Delhi
India

Raghav Sharma

National Law University Jodhpur (NLUJ) ( email )

NH-65, Nagour Road
Kamala Nehru Nagar, Jodhpur
Mandore, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 34230
India

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
505
Abstract Views
2,482
rank
66,841
PlumX Metrics